4.7 Article

Laurus nobilis leaf extract mediated green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles: Characterization and biomedical applications

Journal

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 1213-1222

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.10.038

Keywords

Laurus nobilis; ZnO NPs; Flower structure; Antibacterial; Antibiofilm; Anticancer activity

Funding

  1. DST, New Delhi, India under INSPIRE programme [IF140145]
  2. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), New Delhi, India [BT/PR7903/AAQ/3/638/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study reports the green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using the aqueous leaf extract of Laurus nobilis (Ln-ZnO NPs) by co-precipitation method. The synthesized Ln-ZnO NPs were characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy, FTIR, XRD, TEM, SEM and EDX. Ln-ZnO NPs were crystalline in nature, flower like and have hexagonal wurtzite structure with a mean particle size of 47.27 nm. The antibacterial activity of Ln-ZnO NPs was greater against Gram positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria than Gram negative (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) bacteria. The zone of inhibition against S. aureus was 11.4, 12.6 and 14.2 mm at 25, 50 and 75 mu g mL (1). The zone of inhibition against P. aeruginosa was 9.8, 10.2 and 11.3 mm at 25, 50 and 75 mu g mL (1). The light and confocal laser scanning microscopic images evidenced that Ln-ZnO NPs effectively inhibited the biofilm growth of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa at 75 mu g mL (1). The cytotoxicity studies revealed that Ln-ZnO NPs showed no effect on normal murine RAW264.7 macrophage cells. On the other hand, Ln-ZnO NPs were effective in inhibiting the viability of human A549 lung cancer cells at higher concentrations of 80 mu g mL (1). The morphological changes in the Ln-ZnO NPs treated A549 lung cancer cells were observed under phase contrast microscope. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available