4.7 Article

Synthesis of Thiazolium-Labeled 1,3,4-Oxadiazole Thioethers as Prospective Antimicrobials: In Vitro and in Vivo Bioactivity and Mechanism of Action

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 67, Issue 46, Pages 12696-12708

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b03952

Keywords

1,3,4-oxadiazole; thiazolium; antimicrobial; 3D-QSAR; proteomics; action mechanism

Funding

  1. China's NSFC [21877021, 21702037, 31860516, 21662009]
  2. R.P. Ministry of Education [20135201110005, 213033A]
  3. Guizhou PSTP [LH [2017]7259, [2012]6012, [2017]5788]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a type of thiazolium-labeled 1,3,4-oxadiazole thioether bridged by diverse alkyl chain lengths was constructed. The antimicrobial activity of the fabricated thioether toward plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi was then screened. Antibacterial evaluation indicated that title compounds possess specific characteristics that enable them to severely attack three phytopathogens, namely, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Ralstonia solanacearum, and Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri with minimal EC50 values of 0.10, 3.27, and 3.50 mu g/mL, respectively. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship models were established to direct the following excogitation for exploring higher active drugs. The in vivo study against plant bacterial diseases further identified the prospective application of title compounds as alternative antibacterial agents. The proteomic technique, scanning electron microscopy patterns, and fluorescence spectrometry were exploited to investigate the antibacterial mechanism. Additionally, some target compounds performed superior inhibitory actions against three tested fungal strains. In view of their simple molecular architecture and highly efficient bioactivity, these substrates could be further explored as promising surrogates for fighting against plant microbial infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available