4.7 Article

Relation between functional and cognitive impairments in remitted patients with bipolar disorder and suggestions for trials targeting cognition: An exploratory study

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 257, Issue -, Pages 382-389

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.030

Keywords

Cognition; Functional capacity; Bipolar disorder; Cognitive impairment

Funding

  1. Lundbeck Foundation [R21520154121, R215-2015-4121]
  2. Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research, Medical Sciences [DFF-4183-00570]
  4. Weimans Fund
  5. Markedsmodningsfonden (the Market Development Fund) [2015-310]
  6. Gangstedfonden [A29594]
  7. Helsefonden [16-B-0063]
  8. Innovation Fund Denmark (the Innovation Fund, Denmark) [5164-00001B]
  9. Copenhagen Center for Health Technology (CACHET)
  10. EU H2020 ITN (EU project) [722 561]
  11. Augustinusfonden [16-0083]
  12. Ivan Nielsens Fond for Personer med Specielle Sindslidelser [07018014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Trials targeting cognition in bipolar disorder (BD) are advised to include a measure of functional capacity as key secondary or co-primary outcome to assess whether treatment efficacy on cognition translates into enhanced functional capacity. However, it is unclear which measure of functional capacity shows the strongest association with objectively-measured cognition and may thus be best suited for inclusion in cognition trials. Methods: Participants (N = 58) with BD in partial or full remission with objective cognitive impairment and healthy controls (N = 37) were assessed with mood ratings and were given a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests and a questionnaire assessing subjective cognitive function, respectively. They were also assessed with performance-based, interview-based and self-reported measures of functional capacity. Associations between objective and subjective cognition and measures of functional capacity were assessed with correlation analyses. For significant correlations, multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess if the associations remained significant after adjustment for clinical and demographic variables. Results: Objectively-measured cognition was directly associated with performance-based functional capacity (beta = 0.37, p < 0.01) also after adjustment for clinical and demographic variables, but not with self-reported or interview-based functional capacity (ps >= 0 .20). In contrast, subjective cognitive complaints were associated with self-reported (beta = 0.59, p < 0.01) and interview-based functional capacity (beta = 0.47, p < 0.01), but not performance-based functional capacity (ps >= 0.28). Limitations: The cross-sectional design and modest sample size. Conclusions: A performance-based measure of functional capacity seems most feasible for inclusion as a secondary outcome in cognition trials to capture improved functional capacity following treatment-related improvements in cognition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available