4.6 Article

A Causal Time-Series Model Based on Multilayer Perceptron Regression for Forecasting Taiwan Stock Index

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0219622019500421

Keywords

Granger causality test; time-series; MLPR; forecasting technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stock forecasting technology is always a popular research topic because accurate forecasts allow profitable investments and social change. We postulate, based on past research, three major drawbacks for using time series in forecasting stock prices as follows: (1) a simple time-series model provides insufficient explanations for inner and external interactions of the stock market; (2) the variables of a time series behave in strict stationarity, but economic time-series are usually in a nonlinear or nonstationary state and (3) the forecasting factors of multivariable time-series are selected based on researcher's knowledge, and such a method is a subjective way to construct a forecasting model. Therefore, this paper proposes a causal time-series model to select forecasting factors and builds a machine learning forecast model. The Granger causality test is utilized first in the proposed model to select the critical factors from technical indicators and market indexes; next, a multilayer perceptron regression (MLPR) is employed to construct a forecasting model. This paper collected financial data over a 13-year period (from 2003 to 2015) of the Taiwan stock index (TAIEX) as experimental datasets. Furthermore, the root mean square error (RMSE) was used as a performance indicator, and we use five forecasting models as comparison models. The results reveal that the proposed model outperforms the comparison models in forecasting accuracy and performs well for three key indicators. LAG1, S&P500 and DJIA, are critical factors in all 11 of our time sliding windows (T1-T11). We offer these results to investors to aid in their decision-making processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available