4.7 Article

Nickel based catalysts for methane dry reforming: Effect of supports on catalytic activity and stability

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 44, Issue 52, Pages 28065-28076

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.050

Keywords

Ni catalysts; Methane thy reforming; Catalysts' deactivation; Support effect

Funding

  1. MIUR-Italy [PRIN2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methane dry reforming (MDR) is a promising process for syngas production through the valorisation of two of the main Greenhouse gases. Despite the high endothermicity, it should be carried out at low temperature to directly use the syngas for Fischer-Tropsch reaction and oxygenated chemical production. The catalyst plays a key role in this process as it must encourage syngas formation by limiting coke deactivation. This work focusses the attention on the effect of different supports in the activity and stability of nickel-based catalysts. In particular, MDR has been studied at relatively low temperature, 500 degrees C, to deeply investigate how the support influences the reaction pathway. Ceria, zirconia, alumina, silica and titania were considered and the morphological and structural features of the materials were analysed via N-2-physisorption, AAS, TPR, XRD, CO2-TPD, and SEM techniques. Moreover, by analysing the spent catalysts, it was possible to identify the causes of catalysts deactivation. Titania based catalyst is not active for MDR, while silica and zirconia present moderated activity due to the poor support stability. Most promising results are obtained with ceria and alumina-based catalysts; for these materials, 70-h reaction was carried out and alumina catalyst has proved to be the most stable towards MDR at low reaction temperature with a stable H-2 yield of 25%. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available