4.3 Article

A Robust Design Optimization Method Considering Correlated Intervals

Journal

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0219876219500798

Keywords

Robust design optimization; multi-dimensional parallelepiped convex model; correlated intervals

Funding

  1. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51621004]
  2. Major Projects of National Science Foundation of China [51490662]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the robust design, correlations of uncertain parameters exist widely and have an influence on the results in most cases. It is essential to develop a robust design optimization method considering parametric correlation to future improve the analysis accuracy and engineering applicability. In this paper, a robust design optimization method based on multidimensional parallelepiped convex model is presented. Considering the effects of the interval uncertainties and their correlations, a robust design optimization model considering correlated intervals is established. In the established model, the average performance and robustness of the system response of concern are taken as the design optimization objectives, and the correlations among interval parameters are quantified by integrating the multidimensional parallelepiped convex model. And then, through an independence transforming procedure it can be converted into an independent interval model, which is ultimately converted into a deterministic multi-objective optimization model by using the interval possibility degree to cope with the uncertain constraints. Finally, the deterministic multi-objective optimization model is treated by coupling an efficient micro multi-objective genetic algorithm with the first order Taylor expansion. The feasibility and practicability of the proposed method are demonstrated by the numerical and engineering examples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available