4.7 Article

A porous-cross linked enzyme aggregates of maltogenic amylase from Bacillus lehensis G1: Robust biocatalyst with improved stability and substrate diffusion

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 1222-1231

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.101

Keywords

Enzyme immobilization; Porous agent; Chitosan

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [FRGS/1/2016/STG05/UTM/02/2, 4F888]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enzymatic synthesis of maltooligosaccharides is hampered due to lack of stability of soluble enzyme. This limitation can be tackled by cross linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) immobilization approach. However, substrate diffusion is a major bottleneck in cross linking technology. Herein, CLEAs of maltogenic amylase from Bacillus lehensis G1 (Magi) was developed with addition of porous agent (Mag1-p-CLEAs). Comparison of thermal, pH and kinetic analysis with CLEAs without porous agent (Mag1-CLEAs) and free Magl was performed. Mag1-pCLEAs with porous structure prepared at 0.8% (w/v) of citrus pectin (porous agent), 0.25% (w/v) of chitosan (cross linker) and cross linked for 1.5 h yielded 91.20% activity. 80% of activity is retained after 30 min of incubation at 40 degrees C and showed longer half-life than free Mag1 and Mag1-CLEAs. Mag1-p-CLEAs also showed pH stability at acidic and alkaline pH. The 1.68-fold increase in V-max value in comparison to Mag1-CLEAs showed that the presence of pores of Mag1-p-CLEAs enhanced the beta-cyclodextrin accessibility. The increase in high catalytic efficiency (Kcot/Km) value, 1.90-fold and 1.05-fold showed that it also has better catalytic efficiency than free Mag1 and Mag1-CLEAs, respectively. Mag1-p-CLEAs not only improved substrate diffusibility of CLEAs, but also leads to higher thermal and pH stability of Mag1. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available