4.7 Article

Protein corona of metal-organic framework nanoparticals: Study on the adsorption behavior of protein and cell interaction

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages 709-718

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.183

Keywords

Protein corona; Nanoscale MOFs; Protein adsorption

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M653405]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2018JY0188]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018SCU12043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks (NMOFs) have attracted considerable attention for controlled drug delivery. However, the interaction between nanoparticles and the biological macromolecules of physiological system must be valued because the formed protein corona will endow NMOFs with new biorecognition properties. In this study, we carried out detailed protein adsorption studies in vitro and cell uptake tests of HeLa cells for nanospherical Uio66 and nanooctahedral Uio67. Uio67 with higher binding constants to human serum albumin needed to combine more protein molecules to achieve colloidal stability state than that needed by Uio66, and this phenomenon led Uio67 to aggregate under the same incubation condition due to the formation of a single-layer protein. Uio67 also induced an evident conformation change in protein to stabilize the combination. In particular, the cell uptake efficiencies of the two systems showed a significant thickness dependence on the protein corona. When samples incubated in 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), the intracellular rate was the highest for both systems, but the rate was not proportional to the FBS concentration. Results of this work are important to the development of the considerable potential NMOFs-based medicals and also provide additional insight into protein corona. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available