4.7 Article

Electrostatic spraying of chitosan coating with different deacetylation degree for strawberry preservation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 1232-1238

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.113

Keywords

Chitosan; Deacetylation degree; Electrostatic spraying; Strawberry preservation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501533]
  2. Shanghai Food Safety and Engineering Technology Research Center [16DZ2281400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used electrostatic spraying (ES) system as an efficient technique for strawberry preservation with chitosan (CH) coating. The effects of CH deacetylation degree (DD, 81.0, 88.1 and 95.2%) on the qualities (weight loss, pH, total soluble solids (TSS), firmness, flavonoids content, malondialdehyde (MDA) content and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and mold growth) of strawberry during cold storage were investigated. Results showed that CH coating by ES formed more continuous and uniform protective layer compared with conventional spraying (CS). CH coating effectively enhanced the overall quality and extended shelf life of strawberry at least 2 days. CH coating with 81.0% and 88.1% DD were more effective in reducing weight loss of strawberry, and CH coating with 88.1% DD could better maintain TSS content, while CH coating with 95.2% DD delayed the decline in flavonoids more obviously. However, DD had no significant impact on pH, firmness, SOD activity, MDA and mold growth of coated samples. The evaluation criteria indicated CH coating with 88.1% DD had better preservation performance with the highest synthetic value (6.17) during storage. These findings suggest that CH coating especially with 88.1% DD by ES, as a safe, cheap and efficient technique, has great potential for industrial application of fruit preservation. (c) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available