4.6 Article

A quality-driven assembly sequence planning and line configuration selection for non-ideal compliant structures assemblies

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-04294-w

Keywords

Assembly line configuration; Assembly sequence planning; Batch of compliant non-ideal parts; Dimensional quality; Multi-station assembly

Funding

  1. UK EPSRC [EP/K019368/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K019368/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In automotive body assembly systems, an optimum assembly sequence planning (ASP) not only increases production efficiency and product quality, but also decreases cost and process cycle time. Typically, ASP evaluation approaches are focused on design for assembly criteria, and very few studies have considered the impact of ASP on dimensional accuracy. The major challenges involving quality-driven ASP evaluation can be enumerated into three categories: (1) batch of compliant non-ideal parts to consider real part defects; (2) variation propagation modeling in multi-station assembly (MSA) system in the presence of stochastic manufacturing errors both at product and process levels; and, (3) the development of dimensional quality criteria for quantitative ASP comparisons. This paper proposes a methodology based on the modeling of dimensional errors propagation in MSA with a batch of compliant non-ideal parts to improve product dimensional quality through optimizing ASP and assembly line configuration. It entails three main steps: (i) assembly sequence generation by k-ary assembly operation method for a predetermined assembly line configuration; (ii) variation propagation simulation taking into account a batch of non-ideal parts, station-to-station repositioning errors, and spring-back phenomenon in MSA system; and, (iii) robust optimization of ASP based on developed quality criteria which contains two quantitative indices. The potential benefits of the proposed methodology are successfully demonstrated on automotive front-rail assembly process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available