4.4 Article

Identification and quantification of thymol metabolites in plasma, liver and duodenal wall of broiler chickens using UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS

Journal

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3881

Keywords

biological samples; quantitation; thymol metabolites; UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS; validation

Funding

  1. National Scholarship Programme of the Slovak Republic
  2. Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic
  3. Slovak Academy of Sciences [VEGA 2/0078/16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, we aimed to develop a method for thymol sulfate and thymol glucuronide determination in plasma, liver and duodenal wall of broiler chickens after feeding with a Thymus vulgaris essential oil at the different concentrations (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1% w/w). UHPLC coupled with accurate-mass QTOF-MS was used for identification and quantification of thymol metabolites. Novel Waters Oasis Prime HLB solid-phase extraction cartridges were applied to sample clean-up with extraction recoveries ranged from 85 to 92%. The presence of thymol glucuronide was confirmed by MS software according to molecular formula, score, mass error and double bond equivalent. In terms of validation, calibration curves of thymol sulfate were constructed in matrix samples with linearity from 3.91 to 250.0 ng/mL and correlation coefficients were within the range of 0.9979-0.9995. Limits of detection were 0.97, 0.29 and 0.63 ng/mL and limits of quantification were 3.23, 0.97 and 2.09 ng/mL for plasma, liver and duodenal wall, respectively. Intra-day and inter-day precision expressed as relative standard deviation were <4.35%. To highlight, thymol metabolites were directly detected for the first time in liver and duodenal wall and this method was shown to be successfully applicable for investigation of thymol metabolism in chickens after thyme essential oil ingestion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available