4.4 Article

Dependence of bacterial growth rate on dynamic temperature changes

Journal

IET SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 68-74

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb.2018.5125

Keywords

microorganisms; temperature; environmental factors; mean square error methods; parameter estimation; bacterial growth rate; dynamic temperature changes; bacterial species; bacterial growth profiles; generalised logistic growth model; escherichia coli; model parameter estimation; coefficient of determination; mean square error; environmental conditions

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board [SB/FTP/ETA-0152/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Temperature is an important determinant of bacterial growth. While the dependence of bacterial growth on different temperatures has been well studied for many bacterial species, prediction of bacterial growth rate for dynamic temperature changes is relatively unclear. Here, the authors address this issue using a combination of experimental measurements of the growth, at the resolution of 5min, of Escherichia coli and mathematical models. They measure growth curves at different temperatures and estimate model parameters to predict bacterial growth profiles subject to dynamic temperature changes. They compared these predicted growth profiles for various step-like temperature changes with experimental measurements using the coefficient of determination and mean square error and based on this comparison, ranked the different growth models, finding that the generalised logistic growth model gave the smallest error. They note that as the maximum specific growth increases the duration of this growth predominantly decreases. These results provide a basis to compute the dependence of the growth rate parameter in biomolecular circuits on dynamic temperatures and may be useful for designing biomolecular circuits that are robust to temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available