4.7 Article

Combining Unsupervised and Supervised Learning for Asset Class Failure Prediction in Power Systems

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 5033-5043

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2920915

Keywords

Weibull distribution; power system reliability; asset management; artificial intelligence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In power systems, an asset class is a group of power equipment that has the same function and shares similar electrical and/or mechanical characteristics. Predicting failures for different asset classes is critical for electric utilities toward developing cost-effective asset management strategies. Previously, physical age based Weibull distribution has been widely used for failure prediction. However, this mathematical model cannot incorporate asset condition data. As a result, the prediction cannot be very specific and accurate for individual assets. To solve this important problem, this paper proposes a novel and comprehensive data-driven approach based on asset condition data: K-means clustering as an unsupervised learning method is used to analyze the inner structure of historical asset condition data and produce the asset conditional ages; logistic regression as a supervised learning method takes in both asset physical ages and conditional ages to classify and predict asset operation statuses. Furthermore, an index called average aging rate is defined to quantify, track, and estimate the relationship between asset physical age and conditional age. This approach was applied to a medium-voltage cable class in an urban distribution system in West Canada. Case studies and comparison with standard Weibull distribution are provided. The proposed approach demonstrates higher accuracy measured by F1-Score than Weibull distribution method for asset class failure prediction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available