4.7 Article

Pilots' Fatigue Status Recognition Using Deep Contractive Autoencoder Network

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT
Volume 68, Issue 10, Pages 3907-3919

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2018.2885608

Keywords

Deep contractive autoencoder (CAE) network; electroencephalogram (EEG) signals; pilots' fatigue; wavelet packet transform (WPT)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671293, 61473158]
  2. Chinese Military Commission Equipment Development Department [61400030601]
  3. Open Project Program of the State Key Lab of CAD&CG, Zhejiang University [A1713]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evaluation of pilots' fatigue status is of substantial significance in aviation safety, which faces two major issues. They are how to get the fatigue status feature representation and how to identify the fatigue behavior status of pilots via electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. To solve the first issue, we propose a novel fatigue evaluation index via different window functions to compute the power spectrum of relative rhythms from EEG signals. Wavelet packet transform is used to decompose EEG signals from pilots to form four major rhythms, i.e., delta wave, theta wave, alpha wave, and beta wave, and the combined representation of their power spectrum curve area is the features of pilots' mental status. To solve the second issue, we propose a new deep contractive autoencoder (AE) network with a softmax (SM) classifier to detect the multistatuses of mental fatigue workload. The recognition results of our model are also compared with that of other models such as the deep AE network with a SM classifier model. The experimental results show that our deep learning model has superior classification performance, and the recognition accuracy of fatigue mental status is up to 91.67%, which shows that the proposed method performs excellently compared with the state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available