4.8 Article

PEGylated NaHoF4 nanoparticles as contrast agents for both X-ray computed tomography and ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 218-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.063

Keywords

Dual-modality imaging; CT; Ultra-high field MRI; Relaxivity mechanism; Holmium

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51372260, 51132009, 51402338]
  2. Development Foundation for Talents of Shanghai [2012035]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2015201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well-known that multimodal imaging can integrate the advantages of different imaging modalities by overcoming their individual limitations. As ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be inevitably used in future MRI/X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanner, it is highly expected to develop high-performance nano-contrast agents for ultra-high field MR and CT dual-modality imaging, which has not been reported yet. Moreover, specific behavior of nano-contrast agents for ultra-high field MM is a challenging work and still remains unknown. Herein, a novel type of NaHOF4 nanoparticles (NPs) with varied particle sizes were synthesized and explored as high-performance dual-modality contrast agents for ultra-high field MR and CT imaging. The specific X-ray absorption and MR relaxivity enhancements with varied nanoparticle diameters (3 nm, 7 nm, 13 nm and 29 nm) under different magnetic field (1.5/3.0/7.0 T) are investigated. Based on experimental results and theoretical analysis, the Curie and dipolar relaxation mechanisms of NaHOF4 NPs are firstly separated. Our results will greatly promote the future medical translational development of the NaHOF4 nano-contrast agents for ultra-high field MR/CT dualmodality imaging applications. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available