4.7 Article

Heterogeneous Association Graph Fusion for Target Association in Multiple Object Tracking

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT.2018.2882192

Keywords

Target tracking; Image edge detection; Detectors; Cameras; Trajectory; Task analysis; Multiple object tracking; tracking-by-detection; target association; graph fusion

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0803700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61872025]
  3. Macao Science and Technology Development Fund [138/2016/A3]
  4. Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment [SKLSDE-2017ZX-09]
  5. Project of Experimental Verification of the Basic Commonness and Key Technical Standards of the Industrial Internet Network Architecture
  6. Technology Innovation Fund of China Electronic Technology Group Corporation
  7. HAWKEYE Group

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tracking-by-detection is one of the most popular approaches to tracking multiple objects in which the detector plays an important role. Sometimes, detector failures caused by occlusions or various poses are unavoidable and lead to tracking failure. To cope with this problem, we construct a heterogeneous association graph that fuses high-level detections and low-level image evidence for target association. Compared with other methods using low-level information, our proposed heterogeneous association fusion (HAF) tracker is less sensitive to particular parameters and is easier to extend and implement. We use the fused association graph to build track trees for HAF and solve them by the multiple hypotheses tracking framework, which has been proven to be competitive by introducing efficient pruning strategies. In addition, the novel idea of adaptive weights is proposed to analyze the contribution between motion and appearance. We also evaluated our results on the MOT challenge benchmarks and achieved state-of-the-art results on the MOT Challenge 2017.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available