4.5 Article

The CYSMA web server: An example of integrative tool for in silico analysis of missense variants identified in Mendelian disorders

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 375-386

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23941

Keywords

3D models; 3D structures; bioinformatics; cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR); rare missense variants; sequence alignment

Funding

  1. Association Vaincre la Mucoviscidose [25002221]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exome sequencing used for molecular diagnosis of Mendelian disorders considerably increases the number of missense variants of unclear significance, whose pathogenicity can be assessed by a variety of prediction tools. As the performance of algorithms may vary according to the datasets, complementary specific resources are needed to improve variant interpretation. As a model, we were interested in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) causing cystic fibrosis, in which at least 40% of missense variants are reported. Cystic fibrosis missense analysis (CYSMA) is a new web server designed for online estimation of the pathological relevance of CFTR missense variants. CYSMA generates a set of computationally derived data, ranging from evolutionary conservation to functional observations from three-dimensional structures, provides all available allelic frequencies, clinical observations, and references for functional studies. Compared to software classically used in analysis pipelines on a dataset of 141 well-characterized missense variants, CYSMA was the most efficient tool to discriminate benign missense variants, with a specificity of 85%, and very good sensitivity of 89%. These results suggest that such integrative tools could be adapted to numbers of genes involved in Mendelian disorders to improve the interpretation of missense variants identified in the context of diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available