4.7 Article

Changes from traditional solid fuels to clean household energies - Opportunities in emission reduction of primary PM2.5 from residential cookstoves in China

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 28-35

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.01.004

Keywords

Traditional solid fuels; Clean household energies; Primary PM2.5; Emission reduction; Residential cookstoves

Funding

  1. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [BK20131031]
  2. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [BK20131031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Household biomass and coal use is an important source of PM2.5 emission in China due to low efficient burnings and large consumptions. Primary PM2.5 emissions for different fuels are compared based on a compilation of data from emission measurements of Chinese cookstoves in literature. The burning of pellets had low PM2.5 emissions at 0.42 and 0.18 g MJ(d)(-1) for straw and wood pellets, respectively. There would be an emission reduction of about 80% compared to ordinary raw biomass fuel burning for cooking. The average emissions of PM2.5 per useful energy delivered were 0.10 and 0.28 g MJ(d)(-1) anthracite briquette and chunk, but as high as 1.2 and 3.2 g MJ(d)(-1) for bituminous briquette and chunk, respectively. Coals burned in the form of briquette may lower PM2.5 emission by 60% compared to the burning of raw chunk. The adoption of improved high efficiency cookstoves would have a comparable reduction in primary emissions compared to a fuel switch. Gas should be promoted for cooking as primary PM2.5 emissions are 1,2 orders of magnitude lower compared to those for solid fuels. More emission measurements and fuel consumption survey are needed to fill data gap and to support interventions of advanced fuel-stove combinations. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available