4.7 Article

Can We Detect Changes in Amazon Forest Structure Using Measurements of the Isotopic Composition of Precipitation?

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 46, Issue 24, Pages 14807-14816

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019GL084749

Keywords

precipitation oxygen isotope-ratios; land derived precipitation tracer; Ocean derived precipitation tracer; Rayleigh distillation; ocean-sourced precipitation; recycled precipitation

Funding

  1. NERC (UK Natural Environment Research Council) AMAZONICA
  2. ECOFOR [NE/F005806/1, NE/K01353X/1, NE/N012542/1, NE/K01644X/1, NE/S008659/1]
  3. SPECS project [308378]
  4. ASICA - European Commission
  5. Amazon Hydrological Cycle
  6. BIO-RED
  7. NERC [NE/K01353X/1, NE/M02203X/1, NE/I02982X/1, NE/K01644X/1, NE/F005806/1, NE/I021160/1, NE/N01250X/1, NE/N012542/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large-scale (>500 km) spatial gradients of precipitation oxygen isotope ratios (delta O-18(p)) hold information about the hydrological cycle. They result from the interplay between rainout and evapotranspiration along air-parcel paths, but these counteracting effects are difficult to disentangle, complicating quantification of the effect of land cover change on delta O-18(p). We show that disentangling can qualitatively be achieved using climate model simulations with a land-derived precipitation tracer for tropical South America. We then either vary land cover as observed since 1870 or replace Amazon forests with bare land to determine the resulting signals. Our results indicate that effects of historically changing land cover on annual mean delta O-18 isotope-ratio gradients are small and unlikely detectable, although there is a noticeable signal during the dry season. Furthermore, the effect of changes in water recycling on Amazon delta O-18(p) in paleo-records may have been overestimated and need reinterpretation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available