4.6 Editorial Material

Comment on 'Gigantic rockslides induced by fluvial incision in the Diexi area along the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau' by Zhao et al. (2019) Geomorphology 338, 27-42

Journal

GEOMORPHOLOGY
Volume 402, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106963

Keywords

Knickpoint; Landslides; Lacustrine sediments; Tibetan plateau

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Out-standing Young Scholars of China [41622206]
  2. Fund for Creative Research Groups of China [41521002]
  3. Fund for International Cooperation (NSFC-RCUK_NERC)
  4. National Key R & D Program of China [2017YFC1501002]
  5. Fund of SKLGP [SKLGP2016Z002]
  6. [41661134010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper examines gigantic landslides in the Diexi area and questions the proposed model of knickpoint migration as the trigger for these landslides. The authors argue that the knickpoint migration initiated at a fault and propagated to its present position, causing destabilization of hillslopes. However, the authors counter this interpretation based on their own mapping and observation, stating that the major profile convexities in the area are associated with landslide or debris flow deposits and are not connected to long-distance knickpoint retreat.
Zhao et al. (2019) examine gigantic landslides in the Diexi area along the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau and propose their successive failure based on a knickpoint migration conceptual model. They postulate that a major river knickpoint (KpMJ) identified by them in the middle reaches of the Minjiang River (Sichuan, China) was initiated at the Longmenshan Fault and subsequently propagated -85 km to its present position upstream of the Diexi lake. They then argue that this retreating knickpoint left in its wake an inner gorge that undercut and destabilized hillslopes, triggering a series of large landslides in the Diexi area. We question this interpretation based on our high-resolution landslide mapping, an analysis of knickpoints (i.e., profile convexities N30 m high) in the Minjiang channel network, and field observations of lacustrine sediments and epigenetic gorges associated with the Diexi landslides. We confront the model proposed by Zhao et al. (2019) with three key arguments: 1) Major profile convexities in the Diexi area, including KpMJ, are associated with landslide or debris flow deposits and there is no basis for connecting explicitly any of these to long-distance knickpoint retreat; 2) the giant Diexi paleolandslide predates the debris avalanches at KpMJ, therefore the latter cannot have been the trigger for landsliding in this area; and 3) the spatial distribution of 666 mapped knickpoints in the Minjiang River mainstem and tributaries is not consistent with simple long-distance propagation of an 'incisional wave' initiated at the Longmenshan Fault.(c) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available