4.6 Article

Preconception carrier screening yield: effect of variants of unknown significance in partners of carriers with clinically significant variants

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 646-653

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0676-x

Keywords

preconception expanded carrier screening; VUS; variant classification; Ashkenazi Jewish genetics

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation [407/17]
  2. Abisch Frenkel Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Expanded preconception carrier screening (ECS) identifies at-risk couples (ARCs) for multiple diseases. ECS reports currently include only pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs). Variants of unknown significance (VUS) are not reported, unlike genomic or chromosomal array test results in other post/prenatal settings. Couples who are P/LP and VUS carriers (P/LP*VUS) may be at risk, particularly in genes with high P/LP carrier rates. We examined the possible contribution of P/LP*cVUS (coding, nonsynonymous VUS) matings to ECS yield in an Ashkenazi Jewish cohort, a population with well-established preconception screening. Methods We analyzed 672 Ashkenazi Jewish genome sequences (225,456 virtual matings) for variants in three different gene sets and calculated the rates of P/LP*P/LP and P/LP*cVUS matings. Results Across 180 genes, we identified 4671 variants: 144 (3.1%) P/LP and 1963 (42%) VUS. Across gene sets, the proportion of P/LP*P/LP and P/LP*cVUS ARCs was 2.7-3.8% and 6.8-7.5%, respectively. Conclusion Disregarding VUS in ECS may miss ARCs. Even if only 10% of couples currently classified as P/LP*cVUS are ultimately reclassified as P/LP*P/LP, ECS yield would increase by approximate to 20%. While current understanding of VUS precludes VUS reporting in ECS, these findings underscore the importance of VUS reclassification. This will crucially depend on enlarging population frequency databases, especially of affected individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available