4.6 Article

Disparities in gastric cancer screening among people with disabilities: a national registry-linkage study in South Korea

Journal

GASTRIC CANCER
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 497-509

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10120-019-01017-8

Keywords

Gastric cancer; Screening; Gastroscopy; Disability

Funding

  1. Korea National Rehabilitation Center Research Institute, Ministry of Health Welfare [2016007]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Ministry of Education [2016R1D1A3B03931142]
  3. Korea government (MSIT) [2019R1H1A2080180, 2019R1A2C1087507]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1H1A2080180, 2019R1A2C1087507, 2016R1D1A3B03931142] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aim Using the national disability registration linked to the cancer screening database in Korea, we examined (1) trends in the gastric cancer screening rate among people with disabilities over time, and (2) whether gastric cancer screening participation and modalities differed according to presence, severity, and type of disability. Methods We examined gastric cancer screening participation rates among individuals with registered disability, from 2006 to 2015. Results The age- and sex-adjusted rate for gastric cancer screening in people with disabilities increased from 25.9% in 2006 to 51.9% in 2015 (change: + 26.0%). During the same period, screening rates among people without disability improved from 24.7 to 56.5% (change: + 31.8%). Disability was associated with a screening rate [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88-0.89]. Screening rates were markedly lower among people with severe disabilities (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.57-0.58) and people with autism (aOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25-0.52), renal failure (aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.38-0.39), brain injury (aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.40-0.41), ostomy problems (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.51-0.55), intellectual disabilities (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.53-0.54), or mental disorders (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.54-0.56). The use of gastroscopy as the initial screening modality in people with disabilities was lower than in people without a disability. Conclusions In spite of the availability of national gastric cancer screening program, we found significant disparities in gastric cancer screening participation, especially among people with severe disabilities and those with renal failure or brain-related/mental disabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available