4.7 Article

Acetone erosion and its effect mechanism on pores and fractures in coal

Journal

FUEL
Volume 253, Issue -, Pages 1282-1291

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.034

Keywords

Acetone; Fractures development; Pore structure; Chemistry

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51474211, 51874291]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0801402, 2018YFC0808000]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2019JJ50180]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation for Doctor of Hunan University of Science and Technology [E51882]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of Hunan Provincial Education Department [18C0328, 18A187]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, coalbed methane recovery faces challenges such as high gas content, micro-porosity and low permeability. An exploratory study on improving coal porosity by acetone treatment was carried out. Pore size distribution and fracture development before and after acetone treatment were evaluated using a suite of integrated diagnostic techniques including rock acoustical test, weight analysis, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). After acetone treatment, micropores are partially converted into mesopores and macropores. The porosity of coal increases by 2.66% after acetone treatment. Functional groups including hydroxy, methylene, oxygen functional groups and aromatic hydrocarbons reduce significantly and the removal of these hydrophilic groups significantly weakens the hydrophilicity of coal. New fractures appeared within 32.89% of the eroded zone, even large through-going fractures may appear after acetone treatment. The results indicate that acetone treatment is effective in improving gas productivity thus has the potential to become a new coalbed methane reservoir stimulation technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available