4.7 Article

Effects of gas and particle radiation on IFRF 2.5 MW swirling flame under oxy-fuel combustion

Journal

FUEL
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116634

Keywords

Oxy-fuel combustion; Numerical simulation; Radiative heat transfer; Particle radiative property

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51906075, 91641122]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB0605304]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M612837]
  4. Hubei Postdoctoral Science and Technology Program [G33]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports a comprehensive computational fluid dynamics simulation of the IFRF's swirling oxy-fuel flame with pulverized coal using wet flue gas recycle. Special attention is given to the influence of particle radiative property model. Based on the burnout rate of pulverized coal, a recent proposed nonlinear conversion-dependent particle radiative property model (Guo et al., 2018) is used in the simulations. The influences of the high CO2 concentration on the sub-models are also considered in detail. The gas-phase global reaction mechanism, kinetic parameters of char oxidation and gasification, and gas radiative property model are modified for oxy-fuel condition. The results show the prediction results agree well with the measurements, in terms of the temperature and composition of the flue gas. The particle radiation has an important effect on the flame temperature. Even in the small furnace studied here (optical length is approximately 1.6 m), the radiation in the flame zone is still dominated by particle radiation. Linear variation assumption (Yin et al., 2015) under-predicts the particle absorption in combustion zone. Ignoring the effect of burnout rate on particle radiative property will 10 times over-predict the particle absorption after burnout.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available