4.7 Article

Comparative study of using multi-wall carbon nanotube and two different sizes of cerium oxide nanopowders as fuel additives under various diesel engine conditions

Journal

FUEL
Volume 256, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115904

Keywords

Cerium oxide (CeO2); Nanopowder size; Carbon nanotube (CNT); Pollutant emissions; Diesel engine

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/K503885/1]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806189]
  3. NSFC-RS Joint Project [5151101443, IE/151256]
  4. SAgE doctoral Training Award [NH/140671210]
  5. Chinese Scholarship Council [201508060054]
  6. Cao Guang Biao High Tech Talent Fund, Zhejiang University
  7. EPSRC - Centre for Energy Systems Integration [EP/P001173/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research reports the study of using Cerium oxide (CeO2) nano additive with two different sizes (25 nm and 50 nm) blended with standard diesel fuel (DF-Ce25 and DF-Ce50) at various engine speed and load conditions. Moreover, carbon nanotube (CNT) is employed as a single additive (DF-CNT). Results indicate that the incylinder pressure of DF-CNT is slightly lower than that of DF under the most conditions due to more heat absorption during the evaporation process. In contrast, the in-cylinder pressure of DF-Ce25 and DF-Ce50 is higher than that of DF at relatively low speed due to the improved fuel spray and faster combustion. In terms of emissions, all fuels with nano-additives are overall lower than DF. DF-CNT can reduce CO, HC, NOx and PN by 20%, 22.6%, 21% and 5.5% respectively compared with DF, due to its improved spray and lower combustion temperature. Meanwhile, DF-Ce25 and DF-Ce50 produce the overall higher level of emissions of CO, NO,, and HC than DF-CNT except for PN. A minimum engine (load-speed) limit and a maximum engine limit are found for CO emissions. Furthermore, DF-Ce25 emits higher NOx and lower HC than DF-Ce50, because CeO2 of 25 nm has a higher reaction rate of CeO2 due to its larger surface area and in return hinders the reaction of Ce2O3. The difference of PN emissions between the two sizes of CeO2 is the comprehensive result of the oxidization of particulate matters and the aggregation of unburnt fuel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available