4.6 Article

Using the emotion circumplex to uncover sensory drivers of emotional associations to products: six case studies

Journal

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 89-101

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.04.009

Keywords

Consumer research; Sensory properties; Product research; Emotion word questionnaires; CATA questions

Funding

  1. New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation Employment
  2. New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While emotional associations to products are increasingly used alongside sensory product characterisation in consumer research, studies that link these product responses remain less common. Six studies (104-270 people per study) were conducted using diverse products (salted snacks, potato chips, yoghurt, cheese, snack bars and fruit; 5-10 samples per study). To indicate their emotional response during product tasting, consumers used the emotion circumplex which is a single-response questionnaire that spans the dimensions of valence (pleasure to displeasure) and arousal (activation to deactivation). Sensory characterisation was obtained using check-all-that apply (CATA) questions. Through regression analysis, sensory drivers of emotional associations were established, with different linkages to valence and arousal being identified. Many study-specific linkages were found, but the main result pertained to generalised patterns in some linkages including positive associations between 'sweet' and pleasure, often combined with pleasant activation. For 'sour', positive linkages were established to activation, typically with, or without, negative pleasure. Low flavour intensity was positively linked to the emotion circumplex quadrant that connected deactivation to displeasure. In general, linkages had straightforward and meaningful interpretations, confirming suitability of the emotion circumplex for use in product -focused emotion research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available