4.7 Article

Online non-contact quality control of noodle dough using ultrasound

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 349-357

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.04.024

Keywords

Asian noodle dough; Process control technique for sheeted foods; Non-contact ultrasound; Mechanical properties of dough; Hygienic food quality control

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [STPGP 397292-2010, STPGP 463167-14]
  2. University of Manitoba via a University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowship
  3. University of Manitoba via a Faculty of Science Graduate Scholarship
  4. University of Manitoba via a GETS award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of a non-contract ultrasonic technique is reported for online quality control of noodle dough without compromising food safety during production. The technique uses airborne ultrasound to measure mechanical properties of the dough without touching or deforming it; thus, food safety cannot be endangered during processing by contamination arising from direct contact with monitoring equipment. Measured mechanical properties are related to the texture of the final product, thereby providing information during processing that is relevant to product quality. The technique was first assessed in laboratory experiments and then tested online during production runs on a pilot plant noodle sheeting line. It was found that differences in mechanical properties of noodle doughs resulting from changes in formulation or processing conditions can be distinguished, and that flaws arising from thickness fluctuations in noodle sheets can be detected. These offline and online experiments show the feasibility of using non-contact ultrasound for real-time hygienic quality monitoring of noodles at critical control points in the sheeting process, thereby providing rapid feedback for improvements in process design and control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available