4.7 Article

Effect of kansui addition on dough rheology and quality characteristics of chickpea-wheat composite flour-based noodles and the underlying mechanism

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 298, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125081

Keywords

Chickpea-wheat composite flour; Dough rheology; Yellow alkaline noodles; Cooking properties; Starch crystalline structure; Protein profile; Confocal laser scanning micrographs

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [31501405]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China, China [GK201702012]
  3. Funded Projects for the Academic Leaders and Academic Backbones, Shaanxi Normal University, China [18QNGG010]
  4. Shaanxi International Science and Technology Cooperation Bases, China [2018SD0015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of kansui on the dough rheology and quality characteristics of chickpea-wheat composite flour-based noodles was investigated. For noodle dough, both the relative crystallinity and degree of order obtained from X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy increased with the low level of kansui addition (0.5-1.5%), followed by a decreased trend at higher levels of alkali concentration (2.0-3.0%). Such variation was in accordance with the trend observed for G' and G ''. Based on the confocal laser scanning microscopic observation for cooked noodle samples, the low concentration of kansui addition (0.5-1.5%) protected the well-embedded starch granules being disassociate from the gluten network, whereas with the increased alkali addition (2.0-3.0%), the protein network was impaired with a greater amount of ruptured starch granules being disassociated from the gluten network. The observation corresponded well with the electrophoretic profile, and the results of cooking properties, -SH content, and textural properties of cooked noodles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available