4.5 Article

Toxicity modelling of nanomaterials by origin evaluation of their physicochemical descriptors using a combination of principal component analysis and support vector machine methods

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/exsy.12492

Keywords

descriptors origin; nanomaterials; principal component analysis; support vector machine; toxicity classification

Funding

  1. TDTU University
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry, & Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [10043929]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10043929] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, the performance of physicochemical descriptors of metal oxide nanomaterials on the basis of their origins, including descriptors related to element/ion, the metal oxide in bulk, and metal oxide in the media for toxicity modelling has been evaluated. Three published experimental nanomaterial data sets were selected for the study. The data set was divided into three subsets on the basis of the origin of descriptors; thereafter, each of them was analysed using principal component analysis for visual discrimination of toxic versus nontoxic nanomaterials in the principal component (PC) space. The metal oxide in media-based descriptor subset results in the best visual clustering of toxicity of nanomaterials compared with the rest two subsets. It was also confirmed with the class separability measures in the PC space and classification accuracy of the support vector machine (SVM) method. PC scores of the metal oxide in media-related descriptors results in the maximum value of class separability index (J = 0.0049) and the maximum classification accuracy of 96.43% of SVM classifier (sensitivity of 100%). A toxicity classification model of nanomaterials has been established using PC scores of optimal descriptor subset and SVM method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available