4.6 Review

Quality and equivalence of topical products: A critical appraisal

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.105082

Keywords

EMA guideline; Bioequivalence; Extended pharmaceutical equivalence; Generic topical products

Funding

  1. FCT [PEst-OE/QUI/UI0313/2014, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007630]
  2. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia. Portugal) [PD/BDE/135075/2017]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BDE/135075/2017] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The approval of topical generic products is essentially governed by clinical endpoint studies. Is this the most efficient approach to document bioequivalence in these particular dosage forms? This issue has sparked multiple discussions among different stakeholders - academia, industry and several regulatory agencies - in the active pursuit for new and robust surrogate methodologies. This mini review attempts to critically discuss this topic in light of the recently issued European regulatory requirements within the proposed modular framework for bioequivalence assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available