4.1 Article

Correlation between Argus II array-retina distance and electrical thresholds of stimulation is improved by measuring the entire array

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 194-203

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1120672119885799

Keywords

Argus; retinitis pigmentosa; array-retina distance; optical coherence tomography

Categories

Funding

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness [K08EY023608]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed a positive correlation between array-retina distance and threshold measurements when measuring the entire array but not when using a faster measurement method of four corners and largest array-retina distance.
Purpose: To describe two methods of measuring Argus II array-retina distance and to correlate array-retina distance to electrode stimulation thresholds. Methods: This was a case series of eight patients implanted with the Argus II. Spectral domain-optical coherence tomography array-retina distance was measured by two methods and correlated to corresponding electrode thresholds: (1) array-retina distance at each array corner and the largest array-retina distance and (2) using manual optical coherence tomography segmentation, the average array-retina distance was determined for each group of four electrodes. Patients 1-5 and 6-8 were analyzed separately due to a different threshold programming software. Results: The Spearman's rank coefficient between array-retina distance and thresholds was -0.006 (p = 0.98) for patients 1-5, and 0.16 (p = 0.59) for patients 6-8 with the first method. The Spearman's rank coefficient was 0.25 (p < 0.001) for patients 1-5 and 0.36 (p < 0.001) for patients 6-8 with the second method. Conclusion: There is a positive correlation between array-retina distance and threshold measurements when measuring the entire array but not when using a faster measurement method of four corners and largest array-retina distance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available