4.2 Article

Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Myelofibrosis with Prior Exposure to Janus Kinase 1/2 Inhibitors.

Journal

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 432-440

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.10.005

Keywords

JAK1/2 inhibitors; Ruxolitinib; Myelofibrosis; Allogeneic transplantation; Survival

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Otsuka
  3. CTI
  4. Incyte
  5. Gilead Sciences
  6. Janssen oncology
  7. Celgene
  8. Seattle Genetics
  9. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. Lilly
  12. Roche
  13. Geron
  14. NS Pharma
  15. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  16. Promedior
  17. CTI Biopharma
  18. Galena Biopharma
  19. Pfizer
  20. Sanofi
  21. Millennium
  22. Onyx
  23. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor therapy before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Ha) has not been studied in a large cohort in myelofibrosis (MF). In this retrospective multicenter study, we analyzed outcomes of patients who underwent HCT for MF with prior exposure to JAK1/2 inhibitors. One hundred consecutive patients from participating centers were analyzed, and based on clinical status and response to JAK1/2 inhibitors at the time of HCT, patients were stratified into 5 groups: (1) clinical improvement (n = 23), (2) stable disease (n = 31), (3) new cytopenia/increasing blasts/intolerance (n = 15), (4) progressive disease: splenomegaly (n = 18), and (5) progressive disease: leukemic transformation (LT) (n = 13). Overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49% to 71%). OS was 91% (95% CI, 69% to 98%) for those who experienced clinical improvement and 32% (95% CI, 8% to 59%) for those who developed LT on JAK1/2 inhibitors. In multivariable analysis, response to JAK1/2 inhibitors (P = .03), dynamic international prognostic scoring system score (P = .003), and donor type (P = .006) were independent predictors of survival. Among the 66 patients who remained on JAK1/2 inhibitors until stopped for HCT, 2 patients developed serious adverse events necessitating delay of HCT and another 8 patients had symptoms with lesser severity. Adverse events were more common in patients who started tapering or abruptly stopped their regular dose >6 days before conditioning therapy. We conclude that prior exposure to JAK1/2 inhibitors did not adversely affect post-transplantation outcomes. Our data suggest that JAK1/2 inhibitors should be continued near to the start of conditioning therapy. The favorable outcomes of patients who experienced clinical improvement with JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy before HCT were particularly encouraging, and need further prospective validation. (C) 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available