4.7 Article

Integrating risk into estimations of project activities' time and cost: A stratified approach

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 291, Issue 2, Pages 482-490

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.018

Keywords

Stratified multi-criteria decision making (SMCDM); Project management; Concept of stratification (CST); Risk and uncertainty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estimating time and cost for project activities is a challenging task due to high level of risk and uncertainty. This study proposes using the concept of stratification to improve reliability by considering a set of states and system transitions. By applying this concept, estimations for project activities can be computed more accurately, increasing reliability in completion time and cost estimations.
Time and cost estimations of project activities are challenging tasks for project managers and planners. As a result of the high level of risk and uncertainty present during the early stages of projects, the reliability of these estimations during project planning remains poor. This study argues that this reliability can be improved through using the 'concept of stratification'. This concept considers a set of states and describes a system that receives inputs (associated with outputs), based on which the system transitions from one state to another. This provides a unique structure that is capable of considering uncertainty related to events that may occur during a project. This paper explains how the concept of stratification can be used to compute estimations of the time and cost of activities involved in a project. The method is illustrated with a construction project that has uncertain events. By determining specific activities' estimated time and cost, the project's estimated time and cost can also be calculated. Thus, the proposed method increases the reliability of estimations of projects' completion time and cost. (c) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available