4.7 Article

Adaptive consensus reaching process with hybrid strategies for large-scale group decision making

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 282, Issue 3, Pages 957-971

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.006

Keywords

Decision support systems; Large-scale group decision making; Adaptive consensus; Hybrid strategies; Reciprocal comparison matrices

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71571156, 71971145]
  2. 2019 Sichuan Planning Project of Social Science [SC18A007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large-scale group decision making, which involves dozens to hundreds of experts, is attracting increasing attention and has become an important topic in the field of decision making. Because of the clustering process, a large-scale group decision making problem can be divided into two levels: inter sub-group and intra sub-group. In existing consensus models under the large-scale group decision making environment, the degree of consensus within the intra sub-group is not truly taken into account. To deal with this issue, this work develops an adaptive consensus model for the sub-groups composed of hybrid strategies, with or without a feedback mechanism, according to the different levels of inter and intra degrees of consensus. These different levels of consensus are divided into four scenarios (high-high, high-low, low-high, low-low), and different feedback suggestions are generated corresponding to different cases. This hybrid mechanism can reduce the cost of supervision for the moderator. The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm is used to classify experts. A weight-determining method combining the degree of cohesion and the size of a sub-group is introduced. Finally, an illustrative example is offered to verify the practicability of the proposed model. Some discussions and comparisons are provided to reveal the advantages and features of the proposed model. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available