4.2 Article

Association of CD204+ macrophages with poor outcomes of malignant lymphomas not in remission treated by allogeneic HCT

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages 578-587

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13324

Keywords

allogeneic stem cell transplantation; CD204; malignant lymphoma; tumor-associated macrophage

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Research and Development Fund [26-A-26]
  2. Advanced Clinical Research Organization, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development Fund [19ck0106342h0003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective CD204(+) tumor-associated macrophages are associated with adverse outcomes of various malignancies. We performed a study to elucidate the role of CD204(+) macrophages in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allogeneic HCT). Methods In a total of 81 patients who received allogeneic HCT for non-remission malignant lymphoma, immunohistochemical staining of CD204 using specimens preserved before allogeneic HCT was performed. According to the average number of CD204(+) macrophages in a high-power field, patients were categorized into three groups: low (<25th percentile), intermediate (>= 25th percentile and <50th percentile), and high (>= 50th percentile). Results The B-cell lymphoma proportion was higher in the low group, while T-cell lymphoma and adult T-cell leukemia proportions were higher in the high group. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was poorest in the high group; low vs intermediate vs high = 83.3% vs 43.7% vs 20.2% (P < .01). The 3-year cumulative incidences of relapse were significantly higher in the high group than the intermediate and low groups: 67.0% vs 38.1% vs 18.2% (P < .01). In multivariate analyses, the numbers of CD204(+) macrophages were independent risk factors of poorer OS and cumulative incidences of relapse. Conclusions CD204(+) macrophages might be associated with poorer prognosis in allogeneic HCT for malignant lymphomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available