4.3 Review

Impacts of metformin on tuberculosis incidence and clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages 149-159

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-019-02786-y

Keywords

Metformin; Tuberculosis; Diabetes mellitus; Meta-analysis; Systematic review

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Accumulating evidence suggested that the use of metformin had more benefits for both prevention and treatment of tuberculosis (TB) than non-metformin use in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM); however, it remains to be fully elucidated on this topic. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to determine the association between metformin use and TB in patients with diabetes. Methods The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Information Sciences Institute (ISI) Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from their inception to 15 April 2019. Studies that evaluated the use of metformin and TB disease were included. The quality of each study was evaluated through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). For pooled data, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated; otherwise, a systematic review. Results Seventeen observational studies were included, all of which indicated a low risk of bias according to the NOS. The pooled analysis showed that metformin use was associated with a significantly lower active TB incidence and mortality among individuals with DM (RR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.69, P <= 0.001) and with TB-DM (RR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.20-0.57, P <= 0.001), respectively. Conclusions This meta-analysis indicated metformin use is related to benefits in both prevention and treatment outcomes of tuberculosis among patients with diabetes. Prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm these associations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available