4.5 Article

The role of hydrogen peroxide in the antibacterial activity of different floral honeys

Journal

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 245, Issue 12, Pages 2739-2744

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-019-03393-y

Keywords

Glucose oxidase; Blossom honey; Antibacterial activity; Catalase

Funding

  1. Slovak Academy of Sciences [VEGA 2/0004/18]
  2. Slovak beekeeping association
  3. Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because of its powerful therapeutic potential in wound care, honey has been given much attention. One of the most relevant and researched characteristics of honey is its multifactorial antibacterial activity. Several antibacterial compounds have been identified including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The goal of the study was to characterize the antibacterial potential of honeys from various botanical origins (n = 233) against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and establish the H2O2 content. Five types of honey were identified: acacia (n = 72), linden (n = 23), rapeseed (n = 9), sunflower (n = 8) and multi-floral (n = 121). The overall antibacterial activity of all the honey samples, expressed as a minimal inhibitory concentration of honey, strongly correlated with the level of H2O2. On the other hand, linden honey, which exhibited the strongest antibacterial effect, showed weak or no correlation between the antibacterial activity and the level of H2O2, depending on bacterial strain. The weakest antibacterial activity was documented in the rapeseed honey samples and it was associated with the low content of H2O2. These data suggest that antibacterial activity of honey is mainly H2O2-dependent; however, certain type of honey such as linden honey, showed a strong antibacterial effect which, may be, at least partially, attributed to non-peroxide factor(s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available