4.7 Article

DNA damage in kidney and parenchymal and non-parenchymal liver cells of adult Wistar rats after subchronic oral treatment with tembotrione

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 1800-1807

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06782-8

Keywords

DNA damage; Parenchymal and non-parenchymal liver cells; Kidney cells; Tembotrione

Funding

  1. project Organic Pollutants in Environment - Markers and Biomarkers of Toxicity (OPENTOX) - Croatian Science Foundation [8366]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA damage in the liver and kidney cells of adult male Wistar rats was studied using the comet assay after a 28-day oral administration of tembotrione at doses of 0.0007, 0.0013 and 0.7 mg/kg b.w./day [AOEL (acceptable operator exposure level), REL (residual exposure level) and 1000x AOEL]. As a descriptor of DNA damage, tail intensity was used. Antioxidant status was assessed by activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPx). Significant DNA damage was recorded in the kidney cells at all three doses as compared to negative control. In parenchymal liver cells, significant DNA damage was observed in AOEL and 1000x AOEL doses, while in non-parenchymal liver cells, only AOEL-treated group was significantly different compared to negative control. In both types of liver cells, REL and 1000x AOEL doses were significantly different from the AOEL dose. No significant changes in GPx activity compared to control were observed at any exposure level. The results of the present study suggest that repeated in vivo exposure to tembotrione led to low-level DNA instability in kidney and liver cells. Exposure to the highest tembotrione dose showed a relatively weak response with the alkaline comet assay. Further research should focus on the effects of this herbicide in other models along with different exposure scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available