4.8 Article

Identification of Microfibers in the Environment Using Multiple Lines of Evidence

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 20, Pages 11877-11887

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05262

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarships in Science Technology
  3. NSERC CGS M Scholarship
  4. General Motors Women in Science and Mathematics Award
  5. San Francisco Estuary Institute
  6. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  7. Ontario Graduate Scholarships
  8. Helen Muriel and Doris Elizabeth Hubbert Award
  9. NSERC CGS Scholarships
  10. MEET
  11. NSERC CREATE Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microfibers, characterized as small fibers shed from textiles that are less than 5 mm in size, are a prominent contaminant in the environment. Thus, it is important that we have methods to accurately quantify and characterize them, including in water, sediment, wildlife, seafood, and drinking water samples. Unfortunately, their small size and the presence of different dyes on the microfibers themselves cause difficulties in identification via conventional spectroscopic methods of total attenuated resonance-Fourier transform infrared and Raman. To help solve some of these methodological challenges, we developed a new method employing polymer-dye binding chemistry, density tests, unique surface morphological traits, and fluorescent staining to identify microfibers in environmental samples. The identification method introduced here was tested in our laboratory via trials using microfibers shed from new textiles and environmental samples. We found that the method can be successfully applied to identify the different polymer types of microfibers, which can ultimately help source apportion microfiber contamination in the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available