4.7 Article

Detoxification of ochratoxin A by Lysobacter sp. CW239 and characteristics of a novel degrading gene carboxypeptidase cp4

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 258, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113677

Keywords

Ochratoxin A; Carboxypeptidase; Gene cloning; Overexpression; Biodegradation

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ17C180001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671949]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1608085J08, 1608085QC57]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1600902]
  5. Research Program of Science and Technology of Educational Commission of Hubei Province, China [Q 20161306]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a potent mycotoxin that frequently contaminates agro-products and threatens food safety. A highly efficient OTA degrading strain Lysobacter sp. CW239 was isolated, and the OTA degradation characteristics were investigated. A novel OTA degrading gene carboxypeptidase cp4 was successfully cloned and characterized from CW239. The heterologous recombinant was constructed by gene cp4 and expression vector pET-32a((+)) and overexpressed by E. coli BL21 CodonPlus (TM) (DE3). The recombinant protein rCP4 was purified, and the OTA-degrading activity was evaluated. Although OTA was efficiently degraded by CW239 (24-h degradation ratio of 86.2%), the 24-h OTA degradation ratio for rCP4 was only 36.8% at fairly high concentration (0.25 mg/mL) protein. The degraded product was obtained by immune affinity column (IAC) and determined by mass spectrometry (MS), and the degraded product was the less toxic ochratoxin alpha (OT alpha). Based on the serial investigations of this study, OTA might be simultaneously co-degraded by CP4 and another unknown degrading agent in that degrading strain. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available