4.7 Article

Reconsideration of heterostructures of biochars: Morphology, particle size, elemental composition, reactivity and toxicity

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 254, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113017

Keywords

Biochar; Heterostructures; Structural evolution; Environmental risk; Physical disintegration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21621005, 21537005]
  2. National Key Technology Research and China [2018YFC1800705]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Great attention has been paid on biochar due to potential application as soil amendment. The majority of research concerning the structural evolution of biochar commonly considered biochar as a whole. However, the knowledge of structural evolution of biochar resulting from physicochemical disintegration is rarely known. Biochars in this study were categorized into sedimented particles, suspended coarse particles and soluble components and ultrafine particles according to their suspension property. It was found out that these categories were significantly different in morphology, particle size, and elemental composition, demonstrating the presence of heterostructures in biochar. Additionally, the oxidizability of these heterogeneous particles was tested by Starch potassium iodide method and it presented that the oxidizability of the sedimented particles from high-temperature biochar was the highest. Based on the analysis of Luminescent bacteria test, the toxicity of the soluble components and ultrafine particles of low-temperature biochar was higher than that of high-temperature biochar. The heterogeneous structure of biochar and its effect proposed in this study is beneficial to individualize design of biochar sustainable application and to understand disintegration process and environmental risk of biochar in biochar-amended soil. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available