4.7 Article

A spatio-temporally weighted hybrid model to improve estimates of personal PM2.5 exposure: Incorporating big data from multiple data sources

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 253, Issue -, Pages 403-411

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.034

Keywords

Exposure assessment; Indoor PM2.5; Ambient PM2.5; In-home monitors; Shanghai

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (Youth Program) [21707006]
  2. Beihang University [ZG216S1876, KG12058101, ZG226S18S3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An accurate estimation of population exposure to particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 mu m (PM2.5 ) is crucial to hazard assessment and epidemiology. This study integrated annual data from 1146 in-home air monitors, air quality monitoring network, public applications, and traffic smart cards to determine the pattern of PM2.5 concentrations and activities in different microenvironments (including outdoors, indoors, subways, buses, and cars). By combining massive amounts of signaling data from cell phones, this study applied a spatio-temporally weighted model to improve the estimation of PM2.5 exposure. Using Shanghai as a case study, the annual average indoor PM2.5 concentration was estimated to be 29.3 +/- 27.1 mu g/m(3) (n = 365), with an average infiltration factor of 0.63. The spatio-temporally weighted PM2.5 exposure was estimated to be 32.1 +/- 13.9 mu g/m(3) (n = 365), with indoor PM2.5 contributing the most (85.1%), followed by outdoor (7.6%), bus (3.7%), subway (3.1%), and car (0.5%). However, considering that outdoor PM2.5 makes a significant contribution to indoor PM2.5, outdoor PM2.5 was responsible for most of the exposure in Shanghai. A heatmap of PM2.5 exposure indicated that the inner-city exposure index was significantly higher than that of the outskirts city, which demonstrated that the importance of spatial differences in population exposure estimation. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available