4.7 Article

Blast resistance of small-scale RCS in experimental test and numerical analysis

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 199, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109610

Keywords

Blast test; Small-scaled RCS; Failure pattern; Blast resistance

Funding

  1. NSFC [51508148]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016T90563, 2015M581980]
  3. open fund of Anhui Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Structures and Materials in Hefei University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental and numerical studies are conducted to investigate the blast behavior of small-scale reinforced concrete slab (RCS), which is proposed to overcome the disadvantage of the previous studies without verification. A three-dimensional finite element model is established with validated material parameters, blast load model and reasonable choice of boundary conditions. Three small-scale RCSs are designed and cast, two RCS are subject to the explosion at a scaled distance of 0.611 m/kg(1/3) and another RCS is subjected to blast load at a scaled distance of 0.77 m/kg(1/3) to calibrate and validate the finite element model. The experimental results of damage area and linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs) are analyzed and compared with finite element analysis prediction. The comparison indicates that the failure patterns of these slabs are categorized as three types, including the low damage, moderate damage and severe damage in both experimental tests and numerical simulations. In addition, the numerical results of RCSs are consistent with test results, except for the formation of cracks, which demonstrates that the blast-resistant capacities of RCSs can improve with the reinforcement ratio increasing and the explosive charges decreasing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available