4.7 Article

Improved maintenance optimization of offshore wind systems considering effects of government subsidies, lost production and discounted cost model

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 187, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.115909

Keywords

Offshore wind system; Government subsidy; Time value of money; Maintenance schedule; Production loss; Maintenance optimization

Funding

  1. Taiwan Building Technology Center from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within Ministry of Education in Taiwan [107P011]
  2. Department of Industrial Management of National Taiwan University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the most critical impediments of developing offshore wind systems is the high maintenance cost that reduces the cost-effectiveness of projects. To increase the cost-effectiveness of offshore wind energy, an effective solution is to reduce the overall maintenance cost by improving the efficiency of maintenance activities. Although maintenance optimization is crucial for improving cost-effectiveness, no model in the literature has analyzed the effects of government subsidies, the time value of money, the cost of lost power generation, and location on the optimal maintenance schedule. This study proposes an approach for thoroughly investigating the effects of various factors such as government subsidies, the time value of money, lost power generation, and location on maintenance cost. A dynamic approach was developed to determine the optimal maintenance schedule with the objective of minimizing the present maintenance cost on the time horizon. The results demonstrated that the optimal maintenance schedule varied according to changes in government subsidies under the influence of the time value of money. Moreover, the effect on the maintenance schedule became greater when government subsidies increased. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available