4.6 Article

Self-assembled bimetallic cobalt-manganese metal-organic framework as a highly efficient, robust electrode for asymmetric supercapacitors

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 335, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135327

Keywords

Metal organic framework; Hybrid supercapacitor; Synergistic effect; Organic linker; N-doping

Funding

  1. Nano.Material Technology Development Program [NRF-2017M3A7B4041987]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To obtain highly efficient supercapacitors with extraordinary capacitance, energy density, and cycle life, the design and development of new electrode materials having numerous active sites on the surface are essential. Not only the kind of material but also the surface morphology and microporous structure of the electrode plays an important role in the electrochemical performance of the supercapacitor. In the present work, a bimetallic Co/Mn-metal-organic framework (MOF) has been prepared using a simple hydrothermal method for supercapacitor application. This bimetallic MOF mainly produces a synergistic effect by connecting two kinds of metal ions through an organic ligand. The resulting bimetallic Co/Mn MOF electrode shows a high specific capacitance of 1176.59 F g(-1) (2.76 F cm(-2)) at a current density of 3 mA cm(-2) and excellent cycling stability over 5000 cycles. The constructed Co/Mn MOF//AC hybrid supercapacitor exhibits a specific energy of 57.2 Wh kg(-1) at a specific power of 2000 W kg(-1) and excellent capacity retention of 93.51% over 5000 cycles. These outstanding results are compared with those of similar devices in the literature, thus revealing that our approach is a desirable direction for future research on high-performance energy storage devices as well as hybrid supercapacitors. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available