4.6 Article

Degradation mechanism of LiCoO2 under float charge conditions and high temperatures

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 320, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134596

Keywords

Li-ion batteries; LiCoO2; Float charge; Degradation mechanism; Higher charge cut-off voltage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) consisting of LiCoO2 and graphite electrodes exhibit a trade-off relationship between their reversible capacity and cycle/calendar life in terms of the charge cut-off voltage. That is to say, a higher charge cut-off voltage leads to a larger reversible capacity and shorter cycle life. In order to develop LIBs that satisfy both performance criteria (i.e., have a high reversible capacity as well as a long cycling life), the degradation mechanism of the LiCoO2 electrode under float charge conditions and high temperatures is investigated while focusing on the relationship between the structural deterioration of the electrode and capacity fading. Durability tests performed on graphite/LiCoO2 cells under float charge conditions (4.4 Vat 60 degrees C) induced a drop in the open-circuit voltage as well as capacity fading in the LiCoO2 electrode along with the dissolution of a large number of cobalt ions. Acoustic emission histometry, X-ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy analyses of the LiCoO2 electrode after the float charge tests revealed that the degradation of the LiCoO2 electrode during the float charge tests occurred as per the following steps: (1) the HF generated by the decomposition of LiPF6 reacts with the charged LiCoO2 electrode, (2) the charged LiCoO2 electrode is disproportionated into CoO2 and Co2+ ions, and finally (3) the CoO2 having an 01 structure decomposes into cobalt oxides containing cobalt ions in a lower oxidation state, which is associated with the evolution of oxygen gas. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available