4.7 Article

Responses of the grass Paspalum distichum L. to Hg stress: A proteomic study

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109549

Keywords

Soil mercury; Paspalum distichum L; Proteomics; Phytoremediation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21577130, 21677131]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2015BAC05B05-03]
  3. Chinese International Science and Technology Cooperation Programme [2014DFE90040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Paspaltun distichum L. was tested to evaluate its ability to phytoremediate mercury (Hg) contaminated soil over a 60-d period by analysis of the total Hg concentrations in roots and leaves. Hg concentration in Hg-contamination soil decreased by 70.0 mu g g(-1) after 60 day of grass cultivation and Hg was readily taken up by the roots (4.51 +/- 1.90 mu g g(-1)) rather than the leaves (0.35 +/- 0.02 mu g g(-1)). In addition, a comparative proteomic study was performed to unravel the protein expression involved in the Hg stress response in P. distichum L. A total of 49 proteins were classified as differentially proteins in the roots by the 'top three' proteomic analysis, of which 32 were up-regulated and 17 down-regulated in response to Hg stress. These changed proteins were classified by gene ontology analysis into five complex molecular functions involving photosynthesis and energy metabolism (31%), oxidative stress (14%), protein folding (16%), sulfur compound metabolism (10%), metal binding, and ion transport (29%). Moreover, the protein expression patterns were consistent with the metabolism pathway results. Overall, the results contribute to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the Hg response in P. distichum and we propose a theoretical basis for the phytoremediation of Hg-contaminated soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available