4.7 Article

Making ecological indicators management ready: Assessing the specificity, sensitivity, and threshold response of ecological indicators

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages 16-28

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.055

Keywords

Ecological modelling; Fishing pressure; Gradient forest method; Indictor performance; Marine ecosystem; Primary productivity

Funding

  1. IOC-UNESCO
  2. EuroMarine
  3. Fisheries & Oceans Canada under the Aquatic Climate Change and Adaptation Services Program
  4. project EMIBIOS (FRB) [APP-SCEN-2010-II]
  5. NOAA's Integrated Ecosystem Assessment (IEA) program
  6. IRD, France
  7. South African Research Chair Initiative through South African Department of Science and Technology (DST)
  8. Beaufort Marine Research Award
  9. Marine Institute under Marine Research Sub-Programme of the Irish National Development Plan 2007-2013
  10. Marie Curie Career Integration Grant [PCIG10-GA-2011-303534]
  11. Strategy for Science Technology and Innovation (2006-2013)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Moving toward ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) necessitates a suite of ecological indicators that are responsive to fishing pressure, capable of tracking changes in the state of marine ecosystems, and related to management objectives. In this study, we employed the gradient forest method to assess the performance of 14 key ecological indicators in terms of specificity, sensitivity and the detection of thresholds for EBFM across ten marine ecosystems using four modelling frameworks (Ecopath with Ecosim, OSMOSE, Atlantis, and a multispecies size-spectrum model). Across seven of the ten ecosystems, high specificity to fishing pressure was found for most of the 14 indicators. The indicators biomass to fisheries catch ratio (B/C), mean lifespan and trophic level of fish community were found to have wide utility for evaluating fishing impacts. The biomass indicators, which have been identified as Essential Ocean Variables by the Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS), had lower performance for evaluating fishing impacts, yet they were most sensitive to changes in primary productivity. The indicator B/C was most sensitive to low levels of fishing pressure with a generally consistent threshold response around 0.4*F-MSY (fishing mortality rate at maximum sustainable yield) across nine of the ten ecosystems. Over 50% of the 14 indicators had threshold responses at, or below similar to 0.6* F-MSY for most ecosystems, indicating that these ecosystems would have already crossed a threshold for most indicators when fished at F-MSY. This research provides useful insights on the performance of indicators, which contribute to facilitating the worldwide move toward EBFM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available