4.7 Article

Iconic manakins and despicable grackles: Comparing cultural ecosystem services and disservices across stakeholders in Costa Rica

Journal

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105454

Keywords

Neotropical birds; Conservation psychology; Cultural ecosystem services; Birdwatching; Biodiversity

Funding

  1. National Geographic Young Explorers Grant [C335-16]
  2. SSHRC Insight Grant [435-2017-1071]
  3. Graduate Global Leadership Doctoral Fellowship
  4. Killam Doctoral Fellowship
  5. University of British Columbia
  6. Behavioral Research Ethics Board approval [H16-00693]
  7. U.S. Forest Service [16-IJ-11242309-057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the great cultural and economic benefits associated with birdwatching and other bird-related cultural ecosystem services (CES), little is known about the bird-related CES and disservices perceived by people, and how they differ across stakeholders and species. The goal of this study was to explore CES and disservices across three stakeholder groups in Northwestern Costa Rica. We conducted surveys (n = 404 total) in which we presented farmers (n = 140), urbanites (n = 149), and birdwatchers (n = 115) with illustrations and songs of bird species and collected participants' ratings on items designed to measure multiple CES and disservices. We found bird-related CES and disservices were perceived as six different categories: identity, bequest, education, birdwatching, acoustic aesthetic, and disservices. The three stakeholder groups expressed varying preferences across services, disservices, and species. Specifically, birdwatchers ranked species higher in terms of their education scores and lower in disservices scores compared to the other two groups, whereas farmers scored species higher on identity scores compared to the other two groups. Farmers and urbanites had remarkably similar perceptions towards birds in general, but differed from birdwatchers. Our approach represents a novel method for assessing CES and disservices associated with species that can be adapted and modified for different taxa and multiple geographical contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available