4.3 Article

Variation in Prescribing and Factors Associated With the Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics for Mohs Surgery: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study

Journal

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 868-875

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002203

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAMS [1P30AR069589-01]
  2. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [T32-AR-007465]
  3. Pfizer Fellowship in Dermatology Patient Oriented Research grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Antibiotic use associated with Mohs surgery is increasing. OBJECTIVE To understand variation in practice patterns and factors associated with antibiotic use. MATERIALS AND METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of antibiotic use among patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2017, at an academic medical center. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate for associations between antibiotic prescribing and the surgeon, site, reconstruction, and patient characteristics. RESULTS The odds of prescribing antibiotics differed significantly between each surgeon evaluated; 3.35-fold variation in postoperative antibiotic use was observed. Increasing number of surgical sites (odds ratio [OR] 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.41), number of Mohs stages required (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.08-1.28), and defect area (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.25-1.37), as well as patient female sex (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.03-1.27), were associated with increased postoperative antibiotic use, whereas age >80 was associated with decreased use (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.64-0.87) compared with age CONCLUSION Antibiotics are more commonly prescribed for repairs that are considered higher risk for infection. However, significant variation exists between surgeons, even within a single institution, suggesting a need for prospective trials and consensus guideline development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available